高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Association between thoracic epidural anesthesia and driving pressure in adult patients undergoing elective major upper abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
出处:

关键词: Thoracic epidural anesthesia Driving pressure Postoperative pulmonary complications Major upper abdominal surgery Lung-protective ventilation

摘要:
Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) is associated with a knowledge gap regarding its mechanisms in lung protection and reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Driving pressure (ΔP), an alternative indicator of alveolar strain, is closely linked to reduced PPCs with lower ΔP values. We aim to investigate whether TEA contributes to lung protection by lowering ΔP during mechanical ventilation.In this prospective, randomized, patient and evaluator-blinded parallel study, adult patients scheduled for elective major upper abdominal surgery were assigned to either the TEA group with combined thoracic epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia (TEA-GA) (n = 30) or the control group with only general anesthesia (GA) (n = 30).The primary outcome was the minimum ΔP determined based on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) after intubation. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of PPCs within seven days, the minimum ΔP at various time points, blood gas analysis, intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality rate.The TEA group had a significantly lower minimum ΔP titrated based on PEEP compared to the control group (11.23 ± 2.19 cmH2O vs. 12.67 ± 2.70 cmH2O; P = 0.028). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that intraoperative TEA application (compared with its absence; unstandardized beta coefficient (B) = -1.289; P = 0.008) significantly correlated with ΔP. The incidence of PPCs did not differ significantly between the two groups (8 of 30 [26.7%] vs. 12 of 30 [40%]; P = 0.273), but the incidence of atelectasis in the TEA group was significantly lower than in the control group (5 of 30 [16.7%] vs. 12 of 30 [40.7%]; P = 0.012). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that ΔP was the only variable significantly associated with PPCs (Adjusted Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.190; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.300 to 3.689; P = 0.003).Compared to GA, TEA-GA can reduce intraoperative ΔP in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery, especially those undergoing laparoscopic surgery. However, compared to GA combined with ΔP-guided ventilation, TEA-GA combined with ΔP-guided ventilation does not reduce the risk of PPCs. There was no significant difference in the total use of various vasoactive drugs between the two groups.This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number ChiCTR2300068778 date of registration February 28, 2023).© 2024. The Author(s).

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 麻醉学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2024]版:
最新[2023]版:
Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2024版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2023版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:56916 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1772 更新日期:2025-01-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 昆明医科大学第一附属医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:云南省昆明市西昌路295号(650032)