机构:[1]Chinese Acad Med Sci, Grad Sch, Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing, Peoples R China[2]Kunming Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China昆明医科大学附属第一医院[3]Kunming Med Univ, Dept Plast Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, 295 Xichang Rd, Kunming 650032, Yunnan, Peoples R China昆明医科大学附属第一医院
The treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars remains a challenge. Although triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) is one of the most common and effective treatments for keloids and hypertrophic scars, TAC is not effective in some patients, and some may even experience adverse outcomes. Verapamil might be considered a safe alternative to TAC. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of verapamil and TAC for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Three databases (Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL database) were electronically searched from 1997 to December 2019. Article selection was limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Two authors independently assessed the selection of studies, risk of bias, and extracted the data. Mean differences (MDs) were computed for continuous variables, risk ratios (RRs) were computed for dichotomous variables, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for both assessments. Five RCTs were included, comprising a total of 215 patients (273 scars). Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) parameters (such as height, vascularity, pliability, and pigmentation) were reported as the outcome measures and provided detailed values in four studies. No significant differences were observed between verapamil and TAC in the reduction of height (MD 0.57, 95% CI -0.94 to 2.08, P = .46), vascularity (MD 0.30, 95% CI -0.42 to 1.02, P = .41), pliability (MD 0.67, 95% CI -1.12 to 2.47, P = .46), and degree of pigmentation (MD 0.14, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.69, P = .61). Adverse outcomes were reported in four studies. The results showed that the incidence of telangiectasia and skin atrophy that used verapamil was significantly lower than that for TAC. Concerning the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars, even though verapamil was safer than TAC, TAC worked faster than verapamil. Furthermore, we did not find any clear evidence that verapamil was more or less effective than TAC. Considering the high degree of safety of verapamil, we suggest that verapamil might be used as an alternative treatment when TAC results in adverse outcomes.
基金:
National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China [81460296, 81860343, 81860348]
第一作者机构:[1]Chinese Acad Med Sci, Grad Sch, Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[3]Kunming Med Univ, Dept Plast Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, 295 Xichang Rd, Kunming 650032, Yunnan, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Liu Ruiquan,Yang Bin,Deng Zhu,et al.Efficacy and safety of verapamil vs triamcinolone acetonide for keloids and hypertrophic scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY.2020,33(4):doi:10.1111/dth.13564.
APA:
Liu, Ruiquan,Yang, Bin,Deng, Zhu,Liu, Liu&Zhao, Xian.(2020).Efficacy and safety of verapamil vs triamcinolone acetonide for keloids and hypertrophic scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis.DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY,33,(4)
MLA:
Liu, Ruiquan,et al."Efficacy and safety of verapamil vs triamcinolone acetonide for keloids and hypertrophic scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis".DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY 33..4(2020)