高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Efficacy and safety of bupropion hydrochloride extended-release versus escitalopram oxalate in Chinese patients with major depressive disorder: Results from a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

| 导出 | |

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ SSCI

机构: [a]Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China [b]Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai, China [c]Depression Treatment Center, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [d]Beijing HuiLongGuan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China [e]Department of Psychiatry, Brains Hospital of Hunan Province, Changsha, China [f]Department of Psychiatry, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China [g]GlaxoSmithKline (China) R&D Company Limited, Shanghai, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Antidepressant Clinical trials Depression Mood disorders Pharmacotherapy

摘要:
Background: This study evaluated the non-inferiority of bupropion extended-release (XL) compared to escitalopram for acute-phase treatment of Chinese patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: This randomized (1:1), double-blind, active-control study conducted between February 2015 and October 2016 included patients with MDD (DSM-IV) (N = 538). The treatment phase had three dose levels (level 1 [Week 1], level 2 [Week 2-4], and level 3 [Week 5-8]), which included either bupropion XL 150 mg, 300 mg, 300 mg or escitalopram 10 mg, 10 mg, 10-20 mg (once-daily), respectively. Primary outcome was mean change from baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HAMD-17) total score at Week 8. Results: Overall, 534 patients (bupropion XL, n = 266; escitalopram, n = 268) received at least one dose of study medication. The least square mean (standard error) change from baseline in HAMD-17 total score at Week 8 was -14.5 (0.41) in bupropion XL group and -15.4 (0.39) in escitalopram group (mean difference: 0.8 [ - 0.27, 1.94]). The response rate was 69.6% versus 72.9%, remission rate was 39.7% versus 47.2%, sustained response rate was 51.6% versus 56.3%, and sustained remission rate was 25.5% versus 28.6%, respectively, for bupropion XL versus escitalopram group. Adverse events were reported by 313 patients (bupropion XL, n = 157; escitalopram, n = 156); the most common on-treatment adverse event in both groups was nausea (10.5% versus 18.7%, respectively). Limitations: A non-inferiority short-term (8 weeks) study without a placebo arm. Conclusion: Results from this study demonstrated that the efficacy of bupropion XL was non-inferior to that of escitalopram in Chinese patients with MDD.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 临床神经病学 3 区 精神病学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 临床神经病学 2 区 精神病学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q1 PSYCHIATRY Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q2 PSYCHIATRY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q1 PSYCHIATRY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [a]Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China [b]Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [*1]Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai, 200030, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:52537 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1562 更新日期:2024-09-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 昆明医科大学第一附属医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:云南省昆明市西昌路295号(650032)