机构:[1]School of Humanities and Management, Guangdong Medical College, Dongguan, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China[2]Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA[3]School of Public Health,Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan[4]First Affiliated Hospital,Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan昆明医科大学附属第一医院[5]Central Hospital of Tai’an, Shangdong Province[6]Medical School of Tongji University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
Context. Quality of life (QOL) for patients is now a worldwide concern, but there are few specific instruments developed by modular approach to measure outcomes in chronic diseases. Objectives. This study aimed to develop and validate the System of Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases-General Module (QLICD-GM). Methods. Based on the World Health Organization's definition of QOL and programmed decision procedures, the QLICD-GM was developed using focus group discussions, pilot tests of 201 cases, and field tests of 620 cases representing seven different chronic diseases. The number of items in the final version was reduced to 30 from a 73-item pool, and the psychometric properties of the scale were evaluated by indicators, such as validity and reliability coefficients, standardized response mean, and statistical methods of correlational analysis, t-tests, and structural equation modeling. Results. Correlational and structural equation model analyses confirmed good construct validity with root mean square error of approximation of 0.0606, nonnormed fit index of 0.941, and comparative fit index of 0.947. Test-retest reliability coefficients for all domains and facets were higher than 0.70, with a range of 0.71-0.92, and the internal consistency alphas for most domains and facets were higher than 0.65 (ranging from 0.52 to 0.89). All domains and overall scores of the QLICD-GM had a statistically significant change after treatment, with moderate effect size. Conclusion. The QLICD-GM has good validity, reliability, and better responsiveness compared with the SF-36 (R) Health Survey and can be used as the general module for chronic diseases. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011; 42: 93-104. (C) 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
基金:
This study was supported by grants from the
National Natural Science Foundation of China
(30360092, 30860248).
语种:
外文
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2012]版:
大类|3 区医学
小类|2 区卫生保健与服务3 区临床神经病学3 区医学:内科
最新[2023]版:
大类|2 区医学
小类|2 区临床神经病学2 区卫生保健与服务2 区医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2011]版:
Q1MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNALQ1HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICESQ2CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q1HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICESQ1MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNALQ2CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
第一作者机构:[1]School of Humanities and Management, Guangdong Medical College, Dongguan, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China[*1]School of Humanities and Management, Guangdong Medical College, Dongguan 523808, People’s Republic of China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[*1]School of Humanities and Management, Guangdong Medical College, Dongguan 523808, People’s Republic of China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Chonghua Wan,Xin Tu,Susan Messing,et al.Development and Validation of the General Module of the System of Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases and Its Comparison with SF-36[J].JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT.2011,42(1):93-104.doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.09.024.
APA:
Chonghua Wan,Xin Tu,Susan Messing,Xiaomei Li,Zheng Yang...&Zengfen Zhou.(2011).Development and Validation of the General Module of the System of Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases and Its Comparison with SF-36.JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT,42,(1)
MLA:
Chonghua Wan,et al."Development and Validation of the General Module of the System of Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases and Its Comparison with SF-36".JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT 42..1(2011):93-104