机构：[1]Medical Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medicine Collage Hospital, 1Shuai Fu Yuan, Beijing 100730, China[2]Department of Critical Care Medicine,Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China[3]Department ofEmergency and Critical Care Medicine, People’s Liberation Army 309Hospital, Beijing, China[4]Department of Emergency and Critical CareMedicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province,China[5]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Haerbin Medical UniversityThird Hospital, Haerbin, Heilongjiang Province, China[6]Department of CriticalCare Medicine, RuiJin Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School ofMedicine, Shanghai, China[7]Department of Emergency and Critical CareMedicine, Kunming Medical University 1st Hospital, Kunming, YunnanProvince, China内科科室急诊医学科昆明医科大学附属第一医院[8]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang University1st Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China急救及其他重症监护室浙江大学医学院附属第一医院[9]Department of CriticalCare Medicine, Jilin University 1st Hospital, Changchun, Jilin Province, China[10]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University 1stHospital, Urumuqi, Xinjiang, China[11]Department of Critical Care Medicine,Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Background: The aim of this study is to develop consensus on core competencies required for postgraduate training in intensive care medicine. Methods: We used a combination of a modified Delphi method and a nominal group technique to create and modify the list of core competencies to ensure maximum consensus. Ideas were generated modified from Competency Based Training in Intensive Care Medicine in Europe collaboration (CoBaTrICE) core competencies. An online survey invited healthcare professionals, educators, and trainees to rate and comment on these competencies. The output from the online survey was edited and then reviewed by a nominal group of 13 intensive care professionals to identify each competence for importance. The resulting list was then recirculated in the nominal group for iterative rating. Results: The online survey yielded a list of 199 competencies for nominal group reviewing. After five rounds of rating, 129 competencies entered the final set defined as core competencies. Conclusions: We have generated a set of core competencies using a consensus technique which can serve as an indicator for training program development.
第一作者机构：[1]Medical Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medicine Collage Hospital, 1Shuai Fu Yuan, Beijing 100730, China
通讯作者：
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714)：
Hu Xiaoyun,Xi Xiuming,Ma Penglin,et al.Consensus development of core competencies in intensive and critical care medicine training in China[J].CRITICAL CARE.2016,20(1):330.doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1514-z.
APA：
Hu, Xiaoyun,Xi, Xiuming,Ma, Penglin,Qiu, Haibo,Yu, Kaijiang...&for the China Critical Care Clinical Trials Group CCCCTG and the Task Force of Core Competencies in Intensive and Critical Care Medicine Training in China.(2016).Consensus development of core competencies in intensive and critical care medicine training in China.CRITICAL CARE,20,(1)
MLA：
Hu, Xiaoyun,et al."Consensus development of core competencies in intensive and critical care medicine training in China".CRITICAL CARE 20..1(2016):330
医学