高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Effectiveness of mirtazapine as add-on to paroxetine v. paroxetine or mirtazapine monotherapy in patients with major depressive disorder with early non-response to paroxetine: A two-phase, multicentre, randomized, double-blind clinical trial

| 导出 | |

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ SSCI

机构: [a]Natl. Clin. Research Center for Mental Disorders and Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [b]Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [c]Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom [d]Department of Psychiatry, First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei, China [e]Department of Psychiatry, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an, China [f]Department of Neurology, First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China [g]Department of Psychiatry, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming Yunnan, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Antidepressant early non-response MDD RCT

摘要:
BackgroundThis study aimed to examine the efficacy of combining paroxetine and mirtazapine v. switching to mirtazapine, for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have had an insufficient response to SSRI monotherapy (paroxetine) after the first 2 weeks of treatment.MethodsThis double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, three-arm study recruited participants from five hospitals in China. Eligible participants were aged 18-60 years with MDD of at least moderate severity. Participants received paroxetine during a 2-week open-label phase and patients who had not achieved early improvement were randomized to paroxetine, mirtazapine or paroxetine combined with mirtazapine for 6 weeks. The primary outcome was improvement on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAMD-17) scores 6 weeks after randomization.ResultsA total of 204 patients who showed early non-response to paroxetine monotherapy were randomly assigned to receive either mirtazapine and placebo (n = 68), paroxetine and placebo (n = 68) or mirtazapine and paroxetine (n = 68), with 164 patients completing the outcome assessment. At week 8, the least squares (LS) mean change of HAMD-17 scores did not significantly differ among the three groups, (12.98 points) in the mirtazapine group, (12.50 points) in the paroxetine group and (13.27 points) in the mirtazapine plus paroxetine combination group. Participants in the paroxetine monotherapy group were least likely to experience adverse effects.ConclusionsAfter 8 weeks follow-up, paroxetine monotherapy, mirtazapine monotherapy and paroxetine/mirtazapine combination therapy were equally effective in non-improvers at 2 weeks. The results of this trial do not support a recommendation to routinely offer additional treatment or a switch in treatment strategies for MDD patients who do not show early improvement after 2 weeks of antidepressant treatment. Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 心理学 1 区 精神病学 1 区 心理学:临床
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 心理学 1 区 心理学:临床 2 区 精神病学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
Q1 PSYCHIATRY Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
最新[2023]版:
Q1 PSYCHIATRY Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2021版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2020版] 出版后一年[2022版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [a]Natl. Clin. Research Center for Mental Disorders and Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [b]Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:52537 今日访问量:0 总访问量:1562 更新日期:2024-09-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 昆明医科大学第一附属医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:云南省昆明市西昌路295号(650032)